Oh, please

Must we? Must we spend a precious week and precious energy debating whether President Obama dissed those with special needs on Jay Leno this week?

Get over it, Politically Correct Police. Obama was laughing at himself, his lack of skills at bowling. He used an accurate image, if not a particularly sensitive one. He was obviously not laughing at the disabled. Intent is everything.

Watch the interview here. It was smart, it was entertaining, it was informative.

There is no issue. The terminally serious, who believe all things human must be greeted with deep, long looks of uplifted anguish, are bores. Those who are working up their outrage are using the disabled to fulfill needs we can only guess at. That includes you, Palin.

We can laugh at ourselves and at each other and still love. We don't need "moralist gotcha guys" sifting every phrase for possible liabilities, when what we need is real work in this real life solving real problems.

Get over it.

A deal is a deal

Look, can we get over all this gnashing of teeth and tearing of hair about the bonuses at AIG? It is not productive and threatens our economic recovery.

Yes, it stinks that AIG is paying out $165 million in bonuses to the boys (and girls?) whose activities brought their company not only to its knees, but into government ownership (80 percent). Barney Frank screams his outrage. President Obama says it is about values.

Okay. But a key value in business is keeping your word. An important business activity is signing contracts, and then honoring them. A deal is a deal.

Or nobody will do business with you.

There may be a whole slew of good reasons why those bonuses should be paid. There are many reasons why it may hurt to do so. Read the letter from AIG CEO Edward M. Liddy to Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner (read it here). He didn't like it either.

But the bottom line is that contracts need to be honored.

Now that the government owns most of AIG, the last thing it should do is destroy the company. But that will be the result if government runs the business like government, instead of like a business.

Thank god for Brooks

A voice of reason, more conservative than liberal, more rational than either.

David Brooks has hit it just right. Read it here.

Central Oregon's pride

"LOS ANGELES (AP) — A former Oregon congressman has pleaded not guilty in Los Angeles to money laundering and tax charges relating to an investment scheme that allegedly cost investors more than $10 million.

Wes Cooley, who represented Oregon's 2nd Congressional District for one term in the 1990s, entered his plea Monday in federal court. (Cooley, a Reagan Republican, lied about his service in Vietnam.)

An indictment filed in January alleges the 76-year-old Cooley and two other men lured victims into purchasing unregistered stock in Bidbay.com Inc. by telling them the company would be acquired by eBay for $20 per share.

In 2002 alone, Cooley allegedly took more than $1.1 million in investor cash and laundered it to conceal the fraud scheme.

Richard A. Moss, Cooley's attorney, declined to comment on the charges."

Limbaugh the fascist

Destroyer.
Divider.
Fascist.

Rush Limbaugh is vile, a lying, bigoted pompous ass of a man who would destroy hope for political gain.

Listening to him is reminiscent of public speeches of Brown Shirts in Germany after WW I. Look it up.

He is also the current leader of the Republican Party.

In a speech given this last Saturday, February 28, 2009, to the Conservative Political Action Conference, he spewed his peculiar form of right wing bile sweetened with false patriotism and misinformation (transcript here). It is the same brew first concocted by Gingrich and Rove and fed to conservative talk show hosts via a long handled spoon and web blogs.

Individuals will thrive, said Limbaugh, "if certain things are just removed from their path like onerous taxes, regulations and too much government." That is exactly what happened, Rush, you broke government oversight and now we have a mortgage crisis, a banking crisis, the highest unemployment in a generation, because guys like you (how is your drug problem coming along, by the way?) succeeded in that little superstition.

Rush says conservatives believe in "...Liberty, Freedom. [Applause] And the pursuit of happiness. [Applause] Those of you watching at home may wonder why this is being applauded. We conservatives think all three are under assault."

Right again, they have been under assault for 30 years, but by conservatives like Limbaugh who believe in spying on civilians, government intervention on the deathbed and any other bed occupied by people they don't like, and welfare for Big Corporate donors.

As for happiness, most of the country understands they aren't happier than they were 8 years ago, and they know who is responsible.

"..the bigotry that we're all charged with, just so you across the United States of America know, and you'll see demonstrated here as the afternoon goes on, doesn't exist on our side," said Limbaugh.

Strange he should bring this up. Actually, Limbaugh is quite the bigot, which is why he probably doesn't recognize it. Which is why he featured "Barak the Magic Negro," on his radio show. (See more here). It was spread most ominously by a candidate for Republican national Chairman Chip Saltsman.

"... take a look at all the constituency groups that for 50 years have been depending on the Democrat Party to improve their lives. And you tell me if you find any. They're still complaining, still griping about the same problems. Their problems don't get fixed by government. And those lives have been poisoned," says Limbaugh.

Um, Rush? Have you checked in with who is sitting in the Oval Office? Ya think that would have happened 50 years ago? What a stupid, stupid thing to say. Only such a bloated, self important fool could so blindly make a statement like that.

Then Limbaugh displays a stunningly ignorant profile of history when he asks, "How did the United States of America become the world's lone super power, the world's economic engine, the most prosperous opportunity for an advanced lifestyle that humanity has ever known? How did this happen?"

I don't know Rush, it has been a long 240 plus years. Probably quite a few "hows" in that time. Some good, some bad, some great, some accidental. Rather than ask, why don't you answer the question?

And then, with a false flourish, he accuses with a question: "And why pray tell does the President of the United States want to destroy it?" And the evidence? None. He makes a statement without saying it, the cowardly technique of O'Reilly, Hannity and the rest of the angry hate mongers of the right.

Rush, it was you and Cheney and that little guy from Texas who damn near succeeded in destroying this nation. The mess our President is trying to fix was the result of your policies, not his.

Now we learn that suspension of the First Amendment, bombing of apartment houses right here in the U.S., spying on civilians were all considered. They entertained the most flagrant abuses of power ever conceived in this nation, violations against what it means to be America. That is the legacy of Rush, Cheney and Rove.

There is more. The gasbag goes on and on and on, and the right wingers applaud, even when he makes jokes that God wants to be Rush Limbaugh. What a sick, sorry sight, what a terrible thing to have happened to real conservatives. Real conservatives need to speak up, and throw these idiots to the wolves.

Beware the knives

Liberals have their knives out for fat cat bankers. They should put them away and take a deep breath.

The fact is, there are very few people capable of running banks, large or small, and most of them already are. There is no benefit to turning banks over to bureaucrats, or destroying them and the value of stock often owned by pensions, state retirement accounts, and people who worked hard their whole life.

There are many causes to the credit crisis, and banks are certainly at the center of the storm. That does not mean that individual bankers or banks are villains. Much of the blame goes to Phil Graham and a lot of misguided Democrats who changed the rules and allowed banks to invest in riskier enterprises and give loans to people who did not deserve them.

A whole generation forgot the lesson of the Great Depression and lived beyond their means. We are all at fault, and it doesn't help to point fingers at who might be more at fault than others.

So what to do now? Hidden beneath the headlines is the fact that many "risky" banks are actually making money. They look bad on paper because the value of the assets they hold is unknown. Since the markets have frozen up, it is hard to value property, but the regulators are forcing a "mark to market" strategy that is forcing banks to revalue property at low, low levels.

Because of this, banks are flirting with capitalization ratios that make it appear they are in worse shape than they are, if the same assets were valued over a longer term.

The banks need time, and we all need some sort of confidence in our real estate markets, which requires banks to be able to lend.

First, according to many, we need to pull our banks back from the brink. The best way to do this is to follow the advice of commentator Jim Cramer and implement the same kind of program of "forbearance" that saved the S&L situation of the 1980s. Once there is a market for real estate, the banks can mark the value of their assets in prudent ways, or dispose of them. Until then, the exercise is not only futile, but damaging.

Secondly, the government needs to provide guaranteed home refinancing for everybody at 4%. This will start the process of reducing inventory overhang, and doesn't punish those who bought wisely.

But the current mob mentality of the left, to cut off the heads of bankers and destroy the banks they lead, is horrifically irresponsible. It is the banking system that government should reform, not banks. That is done with laws, not seizure. Once prudent rules are back in place, and the market stabilizes, we want bankers running our banks, and we need our banks to succeed.

Or else the crisis is just beginning, and will be made worse by the Left's lack of understanding and disdain for money.