Wednesday, November 7, 2012

What now?


Victory is sweet. No denying it. We won. And for all the right reasons.

But so quickly is that overwhelmed by the realization that we are still standing in deep shit and we are in it together. It does not matter, today, where that shit came from. It does not matter, today, who kept it from being cleaned up over the last four years.

What matters, today, is cleaning it up.

Conservatives cannot do it today. Any proposal for action makes stepping forward too risky for them, like a capitulation, an invitation to be abused. Their whole argument was that the shit will take care of itself, eventually it will drain away or get covered up or maybe we'll just get used to the smell. That's why the victory was for all the right reasons. America knew better.

That leaves it to the Left. The first task is to extend a hand to the conservatives and thank them for presenting their ideas. Because as our President said, we are lucky to be Americans and other nations fight with GUNS when they disagree.

Tax reform: Let's take Governor Romney's pledge and make it real. No loss of revenue. But at the same time, no increased revenue. The only way to do both and meet our obligations is to become more efficient and the first step along that path is reform of the tax code.

Please. Reform. The. Tax. Code. Flat tax, progressive tax, sales tax… I don't care. But simplify, please. 

Liberals, money comes from somewhere. Every dollar spent on consumption in lieu of investment is a dollar that does not multiply. Yes, the gamblers on Wall Street have to give up their "carried interest" dodges, capital gains should be taxed as ordinary income, mortgage interest capped so the middle class can still buy a home but the loophole limited for mansions. But let's fix the tax code. We can do this.

Medicare and Social Security need to cost each one of us more money. We need a serious co-pay program that does not discourage primary care but makes each of us is cost conscious. It will mean some hardship, but hip replacements in the last 30 days of life only happen because nobody is footing the bill. 

We need to have a serious spiritual discussion about the difference between saving lives and prolonging death. A. Serious. Spiritual. Discussion. Shut up, Sarah.

Education? C'mon, teachers. You're right, children are our future, but THEIR future is in your hands. You are NOT proud of the product.

Industry and jobs: Government employs a lot of people, but it is not government's job to employ people except in certain circumstances. We need roads and bridges, we need teachers and soldiers and battleships, the auto industry bailout was a very good thing.

But mostly, government needs to be a referee: markets need protection from oligopolies, our financial system must not be a casino for Goldman Sachs to play with other people's money, the military/industrial complex must not be allowed to poison our water and foul the air to compete with the Chinese. That's a cost shift, a market distortion.

But Liberals, profit is not a dirty word, income inequality is a great force of inspiration and there are many unintended consequences to the best of intentions. Maybe we can talk about taking the burden off industry for health insurance and pensions so when somebody loses a job, they don't lose access to basic  services? Maybe we can cut a deal, here, that might fit everybody's ideology?

Gays and lesbians, did you HEAR our President acknowledge you in that speech on Tuesday? It was wonderful. "Gay or straight!" he boomed out there at the end. Equal. But look: Marriages are contracts between two consenting adults. It is a contract for living, of mutual responsibility for obligations, rights etc. If we just get rid of the word "marriage," a lot of the animosity goes away. Man-woman, man-man, woman-woman, it's a contract. Why is this a government issue?

Abortion? Gentlemen, please turn this debate over to the women. They will figure it out without your help. Just ask them.

Marijuana? Do Americans 200 miles north of the Rio Grand KNOW what our drug war is doing to Mexico? The cartels control STATES down there now. Allow the market to work. It's a REPUBLICAN idea! Legalize pot, cocaine too, crack, whatever. Addiction is a naturally regulating behavior. Toughen up, let junkies clean up or die, get some taxes out of it and call it a day.

Liberals, we do NOT have a mandate. We have a job to do. And the first task is to turn to our conservative neighbors for help in solving some of these terribly difficult problems. We can't clean up all this shit by ourselves, and certainly not if they are standing on the shovel.

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

Okay. Not so fast, I need more data:

"Medicare and Social Security need to cost each one of us more money. We need a serious co-pay program that does not discourage primary care but makes each of us is cost conscious. It will mean some hardship, but hip replacements in the last 30 days of life only happen because nobody is footing the bill."

And your idea of 'serious' is, what, exactly? End-of-life surgery: the complexities and judgments. http://www.facs.org/fellows_info/bulletin/2012/liepert0812.pdf


"We need to have a serious spiritual discussion about the difference between saving lives and prolonging death. A. Serious. Spiritual. Discussion. Shut up, Sarah."

Whoa, there, Mr. Oregon. Who needs to have this discussion and why are we putting spirituality in the hands of a committee about life and death. Who makes the decisions? What would be the factors? What is the accountability? And if we're tapping into spirituality to determine saving or prolonging life (funny you call it 'prolonging death' -- neat twist to make life a pejorative), why then can't the 'pro-lifers' (see, there's that excellent twisting again in another direction) take spirituality and put it center on life and death. NO pointing to science and feasibility, etc. I don't want anyone discussing my options based on their spiritual schizophrenia.

"Education? C'mon, teachers. You're right, children are our future, but THEIR future is in your hands. You are NOT proud of the product."

The teacher's union is another anachronism. The US education system dates to an agrarian industry. Summers to help on the farm. Reading, writing & arithmetic. Now it's college-prep. Why not the European system? Both Gates and Jobs found no use of traditional higher-ed, even if Ivy-League. One of the largest industries, video gaming production, don't want traditional graduates -- the thinking process is an anathema to out of the box creation.

Ah. I've run out of time. And space. Cheerio.

Eyeonoregon said...

Ya know, I really like it when you show up. I wish you would give me a handle, though, since so many anonymi push through here who don't have your chops.

1) Serious co-pay: I don't know. Dollar amount? Based on income? Means tested somehow? People smarter'n me I am sure have worked on this. My goal was as stated: anything free will be overused.

2) Serious spiritual discussion: I agree, no committees allowed. But let's say grandma is 97 and just fallen and broken her hip. She is in a near-coma. Dr. comes in and says, "she may live for six days, six weeks, maybe six months. Hip replacement will make her more comfortable." We all know that if no one has to pay, the answer will be yes. If family has to pay that what… $70,000? The answer may be different.

My goal was to suggest that this is a spiritual discussion, not just a medical one and not just a financial one. We are all going to die. Postponing that as long as possible is not always right, is not always humane, and is no longer affordable.

3) We need to rethink education from the ground up and I don't think teachers are adding much to the discussion.

Thanks again for stopping by. You always make a contribution.

Eye